Marriage is widely accepted to be something that everyone should do in their lives, but as of late the rhetoric has begun to change and people are starting to think of marriage in a negative way. However, as marriage begins to fall out of favor, civil unions are becoming all the rage. First off, what exactly is a civil union? Well, it is pretty much the same thing as a marriage in that it signifies an official recording of two people that are in a partnership with one another and want to spend their lives with each other but with one big difference: it is completely free of any of the religious influence that marriage usually entails.
Marriage is an institution that comes from the patriarchy. It is full of patriarchal notions and has resulted in the creation of the nuclear family which involves women taking care of the home and men going out and earning. Switching to a civil union would end up eschewing all of the patriarchal and religious history of marriage for something that is a lot more equal and neutral. Civil union is also a great deal more preferable to people that are not part of the majority religion in any particular country since it would allow them to get together on their own terms rather than having to have the sort of ceremony that the state would approve of. It provides people with an alternative that is neutral and therefore preferable to some of the more traditional routes that you could go through.
For a lot of people, marriage as a symbol holds too much negativity to make them feel comfortable partaking in it. Civil unions are new, and for the most part provide a lot of the same benefits that marriage does. It makes it more official when you list your civil partner as your emergency contact after all, and you get some of the same tax breaks that you would if you took part in marriage instead. However, there are not quite as many legal loopholes that you would have to go through which, when you couple the fact that a civil union is often a great deal easier to get out of than a marriage it becomes quite understandable why so many people would prefer it to the more draconian aspects of the more traditional manner of getting together with somebody.
In essence, a civil union helps you make your partnership more longer lasting and turns it into an official economic and social union as well as a romantic one without bringing religion into it. This alone is enough to make people want to do it, but there are so many other benefits that you could look into as well. If you want to be able to get a civil union, make sure you do enough research in order to ensure that you have all of the necessary information whilst going into it.
2017 was a year of enormous change for the world. America elected a populist leader that openly mocked the political process for the very first time, but this was not the only nation in the west that ended up seeing a distinct change in its political rhetoric. The EU also saw a lot of change. Some may argue that the fact that the EU did not end up electing a populist leader might show that the area is going in the right direction, but one thing to note is that populist leaders don’t need to get elected in order to have widespread change over the political landscape of any particular nation.
One distinctly right wing idea that seeped into public consciousness as well as political discourse last year was a distinctly anti immigrant sentiment. The refugee crisis was a huge talking point, and many politicians were against letting more than a few refugees in. Indeed, all across the political spectrum politicians were talking about how their economies would not be able to handle an influx of immigrants. This resulted in a lot of human suffering particularly for people that were crossing the Mediterranean since a lot of boats there were being run through unofficial channels. The lack of restrictions and monitoring meant that the people crossing the Mediterranean ended up suffering quite a bit even if they managed to get to Europe alive.
The vetting process for refugees remained quite strict, with humanitarian visas becoming pretty much nonexistent. Another important thing to note is that a lot of families ended up getting broken up because of the fact that refugees were only accepted on an individual basis. The resettlement plan has resettled nearly twenty five thousand refugees with the number set to double in the next two years, but the lack of family reunification makes this process not quite as effective as it would otherwise be at dealing with said humanitarian crisis.
There is also the fact that most EU member states only took a serious interest in the humanitarian crisis if they were not in the direct line of sight for refugees leaving war torn areas. This meant that member states that were not already struck with an influx of refugees did not want to help shoulder the burden, preferring to leave that to coastal nations that had no choice but to deal with the matter at hand.
Not much progress has been made when it comes to asylum laws in the EU, and chances are that not much headway is going to be made anytime soon since so many right wing populists are gaining support in a majority of member states. Only time will tell whether or not the EU has what it takes to take care of people that are fleeing war torn parts of the world. As one of the most powerful political entities in the world, such a thing could be considered its responsibility.
In the aftermath of one of the most gruesome and devastating conflicts in history, the Second World War, an agreement was signed that was intended to keep people safe and guarantee them the basic rights that every human should enjoy. However, in spite of the fact that this agreement was signed, there are dozens of conflicts currently being fought around the world, and the people that are suffering from these conflicts are pretty much always innocents. Many of the victims of these conflicts are just women and children that would have had no chance to survive in the first place.
The first thing that a western country like Canada should do is recognize its privilege. This is going to help it understand that the world is no different from it when it comes down to it, and it would allow both politicians as well as the general public to look at these issues with a little more compassion. After all, Canada has its own share of problems as well. For example, the indigenous population goes through a great deal of suffering which is why so many people have difficulty moving up the ranks in Canadian society if they are not white. Canada also has a great deal of racism as well which is a very important issue that holds precedence in political discourse around the world.
Canada as a nation is very wealthy, which means that it has the capacity to take on a lot more responsibility on a global scale. What this means is that Canada should think about taking in more refugees that are being borne out of the conflicts occurring in various parts of the world. This is not just Canada’s responsibility as a powerful nation, it is going to be good for the country as well. This is because of the fact that Canada does not have a very high population right now, which means that the nation is not quite as productive as it could be in the future. Bringing immigrants in is a great way to ensure that the country has a future, and if you think about it this has already proven true in a lot of scenarios. A lot of the immigrants that the country has taken in have contributed positively to Canadian society, and first generation immigrants are known for being extremely upwardly mobile which is a trait that all of Canada can benefit from.
Hence, taking in more refugees is, without a doubt, a mutually beneficial arrangement and Canadian government should certainly start to look into a variety of different ways in order to get some of the refugees in. This could secure a future for Canada where new sectors of industry emerge and new bonds are developed. A Canada with a higher population could accomplish a great many things, and it is a worthwhile cause to try and make this dream a reality.